Today, I
got around to reading some emails which are longer, and tend to be
teachings. One email I looked at was
from my friend and missionary Don Davis, who relayed, from the blog www.preparehisway.com, the posting of
April 25, 2010. This writer points out that Matthew 23:8-10, which begins by
Jesus saying, “Call no man rabbi” was not merely his instructing the disciples
not to use that word. Some versions use
the word “father” instead of rabbi, which I perceive to be a subtle shot at
those denominations which have used that word as a title instead of
“pastor.” The point the writer is
making, which is emphasized in the larger context, but which would naturally
not be emphasized by teachers in the traditional western church system, is that
Jesus was warning them against using any titles whatsoever in the New
Covenant. Whether they actually realized
it at the time of its hearing, or not until the Holy Spirit came upon them in
Acts 1, is a thing for God and them to know, and not us.
I had been
thinking about this situation for a couple of weeks. If the gifts mentioned in Ephesians 4, along
with Romans 12 and 1 Corinthians 12, are truly gifts of God, then no person or
organization can give out titles rightly.
What I mean is this: In our
culture, most institutional churches call the head person pastor, a word they
get from Ephesians 4. Until a couple of
years ago, I didn’t know that that word wasn’t used as a title until after the
Reformation. History gives us some
inkling that the persons, including leaders, in the early church understood
that word to be a modifier of “teachers”, in a way that in modern English would
have been written pastor/teacher, pastor-teacher, or pasturing teacher. Whatever way, today we have in some
traditional churches that have wandered astray, pastors by title who are not
even believers, and clearly, therefore, have received a title, but do not have
the gift. Here’s the opposite side: If a person has that gift of God, and another
believer, for whatever reason, doesn’t recognize it in that person, that gift
is still is upon that person. It doesn’t
take my or any person’s recognizing the gift, and, therefore, certainly not
that person sticking a title onto their name, to make the gift effective.
In the Old
Testament, we consider Jeremiah to be a prophet, but we see that gifting
brought him little but suffering, and the writings of the Old Testament do not
show of anyone getting right with God, or growing closer to God, in his day through
his ministry. While many principles have
changed from Old to New Covenants, usually from a thing being in the physical realm among
the physical Chosen People, to in the spiritual realm among the spiritually
chosen of the New Covenant church, this aspect is equivalent, albeit more
common in this era. God’s gifting is not
associated with people recognizing it.
In theory, the gifted person attempting to advertise it would come
across as, in this one aspect, the opposite of spiritual maturity. Part of the spiritual weakness in some parts
of the church comes from a tendency of leaders, assuredly because they were
taught to do this by the previous generation of leaders, is to attempt to lure
as many people as possible into their program.
In John 6:60-71, Jesus showed the exact opposite interest when He said
things that caused many to stop listening to Him and leave.
No comments:
Post a Comment