I originally posted this on October 3, 2011, but just noticed that this didn't come out well on the blog. This is more readable.
==============================================================2151—Jesus’ Simple Strategy
My name is Tom; this is Simple Church Minute. Today, I quote from the writings of Steven S. Lyzenga:
In
the midst of His earthly ministry, Jesus Christ declared to His
disciples, “Do
you
not say, ‘Four months more and then the harvest’? I tell you,
open your eyes and look at the fields! They are ripe for
harvest”(John
4:35).
Jesus
then gave His disciples the
mission of reaping the harvest as well as the strategy to accomplish
the mission, “The harvest is plentiful, but the workers are few.
Ask the Lord of the harvest, therefore, to send out workers into the
harvest field. Go!” (Luke 10:2-3).
Jesus then modeled His strategy by sending the 12disciples, and later
the seventy, as workers into the ripe harvest field. They returned
with a great report, “Lord, even the demons submit to us in your
name” (Luke 10:17).
It was a wonderfully effective strategy to accomplish His mission.
At
the end of His earthly ministry, on the brink of returning to His
Father in
heaven,
Jesus restated His mission to the disciples, “All authority in
heaven and on earth has been given to me. Therefore go and make
disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father
and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey
everything I have commanded you” (Mt 28:18-20).
Jesus
then modeled His strategy again by sending out the 12, followed by
Paul and many other workers into the ripe harvest fields. This time,
the entire Roman Empire, and as far away as India, was infiltrated
with the gospel within 300 years after Jesus’ death.In fact, in AD
100 there were as few as 25,000 Christians, but by AD 300 there were
up to 20,000,000 Christians!Jesus modeled a wonderfully effective
strategy to accomplish His mission again.
Why
was Jesus’ strategy to accomplish His mission so wonderfully
effective?
Jesus
used a very simple disciple making process. He gathered His
followers together in simple venues (often houses), equipped them,
and sent them out as
workers
into ripe harvest fields. Paul the apostle followed Jesus’ lead,
making disciples by gathering Jesus’ followers together in simple
venues (often houses),
equipping them, and sending them out as workers into ripe harvest
fields. Likewise, biblically and historically, it appears the early
Church made disciples by gathering Jesus’ followers together in
simple venues (often houses), equipping them, and sending them out
as workers into ripe harvest fields.
Somewhere
between the first 300 years of discipleship history and now,
however,
Jesus’
disciple-making process got off track and became much more
complicated. The original model of gathering His followers together
in simple venues, equipping
them, and sending them out as workers into ripe harvest fields
started to drift off track, all the while, losing its simplicity and
effective and efficient reproducibility.
Historically,
the line between simple and complicated models of disciple-making
was
drawn during the Constantine era of the Roman Empire. Throughout
this era,
disciple-making
became the job for a new hierarchical class of professional clergy
who began receiving money to manage the newly formed
institutionalized version of Church. Another major paradigm shift
during this new found institutionalized Church era was believers
having to gather together in newly built cathedrals,
a
huge shift in comparison to the simple house-to-house venues that
early
century believers were used to. From this point forward,
disciple-making became a very complicated institutionalized effort
–much more
complex than the simple approach modeled by Jesus, Paul, and the
early Church.
Close
on the heels of the Constantine era was the spiritual “Dark Ages.”
During this 1000 year era, the institutional Church seemed
to have lost a
vision
for the Great Commission (GC) and did not emphasize the ripe harvest
fields as Jesus taught and modeled in John 4 and Luke 10. Therefore,
disciple-
making
“to the ends of the earth” as mandated in Matthew 28 was all but
extinguished. It’s as if the enemy himself infiltrated Jesus’
simple disciple-
making
method and complicated the process, of gathering His
followers
in simple venues to equip them as ripe harvest workers,by
institutionalizing the church.
When
one compares the Constantine “Rome” model of Church to the New
Testament
(NT) “Antioch”
model of Church, it is far different. And it is
apparent
that the modern Western model of Church favors the former. This
Church shift towards an institutional model, taking place over
many centuries, was
not
without consequences. With its strong inward focus, institutional
forms of church have left a bleak mark on “ripe harvest field”
history. So much so, 20
centuries after
Jesus walked the earth and 17 centuries after this tragic shift in
Church history, there remain 1.9 billion people (28% of the world’s
population) that have yet to hear the gospel of Jesus Christ even
once!
You can contact me at 757757tev@gmail.com or at 757-735-3639. The entire writing which I quoted today is on the web. You can find out more about organic church in this area at www.hrscn.org.
This was an exact quote of from pages 1 to 4 of Steven S. Lyzenga’s dissertation, ASSESSING THE STATE OF SIMPLE CHURCHES IN THE USA REGARDING RELEASING RESOURCES TOWARD FINISHING THE GREAT COMMISSION, which can be seen at
http://house2harvest.org/docs/Simple_Churches_Releasing_Resources_S_Lyzenga.pdf.This passage has numerous footnotes, as one might expect in a thesis, which appear in the original.
No comments:
Post a Comment